“…the sight of a high-ranking university representative stepping in to save a big tech executive from answering a difficult question was deeply embarrassing (or at least should have been) for all concerned.”
And this is the point. #BigTech shielded by academics (a patchy cover at best, though a telling of the power of wealth and its financial control of scientific research). I this case it was about #Google’s AI products where its representative executive Anna Koivuniemi of Google #DeepMind was shielding that the high-ranking university representative and chair, Geraint Rees, ruled an ‘embarrassing’ question out of order.
It’s a short, but enlightening, read well worth your time if your interests include the use of #GenAI in scientific #research.
#ResearchIntegrity #GenAI&ScientificResearch #MetaScience
Read more: https://warrenpearce.pika.page/posts/what-is-metascience-issues-inclusion-and-future-public-value
Aux origines de la metascience
🄱🄾🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶 🅃🄷🄸🅂 🅃🄾🄾🅃 = 1% 🄼🄾🅁🄴 🄴🄲🅁 🄴🄼🄿🄾🅆🄴🅁🄼🄴🄽🅃! 
It strikes me that crowdsourced evaluation/benchmarking of LLMs for scientific work would be valuable and possible in the style of ManyLabs projects.
If I coordinate crowds of volunteers to assess how well LLMs can evaluate papers, would you be interested?
