mastodon.world is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Generic Mastodon server for anyone to use.

Server stats:

8.8K
active users

#msp

8 posts8 participants0 posts today

Minnesota Army veteran: Cannabis need to be rescheduled

discuss.online/post/20911730

discuss.onlineMinnesota Army veteran: Cannabis need to be rescheduled - Discuss Online> As a U.S. Army veteran who served five combat deployments, I’ve seen firsthand the physical and psychological scars that many of my fellow service members carry with them after returning home. > > I’ve walked alongside soldiers battling PTSD, chronic pain, anxiety and the long-term effects of traumatic brain injuries. These are not just war wounds — they are life-altering burdens that often go unseen and untreated. > > In the years since I returned home, I’ve come to see that the path to healing doesn’t always come easily. And for many veterans, traditional treatments aren’t effective, leading us to turn to alternative treatments like cannabis. > > I say this not as an outsider or a casual observer, but as a patient, an advocate and a former member of the Minnesota Cannabis Advisory Council. I’ve had countless conversations with fellow veterans and civilians alike who have found relief through cannabis when traditional medicine failed them. I’ve seen its power, not as a miracle drug, but as a legitimate and effective treatment for various conditions. > > That’s why I strongly support the push to move cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act. The work that started during the Biden administration on this issue appears to have stalled out, and it needs a jumpstart. > > Rescheduling cannabis to Schedule III would be more than a symbolic gesture. It would represent a tangible, meaningful shift in how we treat cannabis and those who rely on it. It would open the door to comprehensive clinical research that has long been stifled under federal restrictions. Researchers and medical professionals would finally be able to conduct studies with the rigor and scope this issue demands, helping us better understand the full spectrum of cannabis’s therapeutic potential. > > And let’s be clear: Support for this change is not partisan. In fact, President Donald Trump has expressed support for rescheduling cannabis, recognizing the benefits of modernizing our drug laws. When leaders from across the political spectrum — conservatives, libertarians, progressives and independents — are aligned on an issue, it tells us something: This isn’t a radical idea. It’s a reasonable one. > > Despite this growing body of evidence, our federal government still classifies cannabis as a Schedule I drug, putting it on par with heroin and declaring it to have “no accepted medical use” and a “high potential for abuse.” > > Veterans, perhaps more than any other group, understand the consequences of bureaucratic inertia. We’ve watched the Veterans Affairs system struggle to keep up with the growing mental health crisis in our community. We’ve watched our brothers- and sisters-in-arms cycle through prescriptions, such as opioids, antidepressants and sleeping pills, many of which come with debilitating side effects and limited long-term effectiveness. > > Cannabis has been a lifeline for many of us. And the irony is, in states where medical cannabis is legal, veterans often still face stigma from health care providers and risks to their federal benefits if they choose to use it. Why? Because cannabis remains stigmatized by outdated federal laws that ignore decades of research and real-world experience. > > Reclassifying cannabis would legitimize it in the eyes of our health care system. It would allow providers, especially those within the VA, to have honest conversations with patients about medical cannabis as an option. It would remove the concern that many veterans face when they bring up cannabis with their doctors, fearing judgment or repercussions. > > We can’t talk about supporting veterans and then ignore a reform such as this one that could improve our lives. We can’t claim to respect our service members while denying us access to a medicine that helps us live with dignity and purpose. We served our country with honor. We did our duty. Now we are simply asking our government to do theirs.

Conservative group, softball players sue over Minnesota’s trans athlete policy

discuss.online/post/20384255

discuss.onlineConservative group, softball players sue over Minnesota’s trans athlete policy - Discuss Online> A conservative advocacy group sued Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison on Tuesday on behalf of three female softball players who say Minnesota’s policy allowing trans athletes to compete on sports teams that match their gender amounts to sex discrimination against female athletes and a violation of Title IX, the federal statute requiring equity in men’s and women’s sports. > > The lawsuit, filed in a Minnesota federal court, was brought by Female Athletes United, a national group that describes itself as an advocate for “fairness, safety, and equal opportunity for women and girls in sports.” It is led by three women with ties to the Republican Party and conservative legal groups. > > Three female high school softball players from Maple Grove High School and Farmington High School are described as plaintiffs. According to the suit, the girls say they have competed with transgender athletes and believe it is “unsafe and unfair to play against a male athlete, particularly in softball.” > > The Minnesota High School League has allowed students to participate on teams that best align with their gender identity for 10 years. Supporters of the policy say it’s worked without incident. > > A recent executive order by President Donald Trump banned transgender athletes from participating in women’s and girls’ sports. Federal officials are pressuring the state now to comply with Trump’s executive order. That includes investigating the high school league policy. > > Ellison has argued that Minnesota’s human rights law lets transgender athletes compete in sports consistent with their gender identity and that the state law supersedes Trump’s executive order. State lawmakers in March rejected an effort to ban transgender athletes from women’s sports. > > The lawsuit is asking federal judges to rule that Ellison and other state officials are violating Title IX. It’s also asking for an injunction to preclude state and district officials from allowing trans athletes to compete with or against female members of Female Athletes United. > > Lawyers representing Female Athletes United are from the conservative Christian Group Alliance Defending Freedom, which has won more than a dozen United States Supreme Court cases, including overturning Roe v. Wade.