Recent searches
Search options
This journal article explores institutional repositories. It found out of 107 IRs only 26 had specific contact information related to accessibility. Over 50% of the IRs sampled had some form of accessibility documentation. Only 39 of the IRs had a link to an institutional wide accessibility policy. Please check out the full article for more information. #accessibility https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/id/18208/
Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly CommunicationAccess for Whom? An Examination of Public-Facing Accessibility Practices in Library Accessibility Alliance Members’ Open Access Institutional RepositoriesIntroduction: Open access aims to provide access to research and scholarship without barriers. An important tool in this process has been institutional repositories (IRs), which disseminate and preserve open scholarship. The goal of this research project was to examine the extent to which IRs in the U.S. are incorporating publicfacing accessibility practices to make their open access works accessible to users of all abilities.
Method: This environmental scan reviews the IRs of Library Accessibility Alliance member institutions to identify the prevalence of accessibility practices across those IRs, including contact information, accessibility statements, instructions for submitters, and accessibility-related metadata.
Results: This environmental scan found that all but two institutions offered contact information, an avenue for requesting remediation and asking questions. Just over half of the institutions offered IR accessibility documentation, and many linked to other institutional accessibility documentation. Additionally, slightly under a quarter of the institutions provided support for researchers hoping to make their submissions accessible, and three included accessibility information in item-level metadata.
Conclusion: While many IR teams are taking some steps to ensure that their IRs are accessible, many accessibility features are not standard across the IRs examined in this study, which suggests the potential for future improvement. Expanded adoption of accessibility best practices would improve access to IR materials and help achieve the ultimate goals of the open access movement.