JdeB<p><a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/USpolitics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>USpolitics</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/SCOTUS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SCOTUS</span></a> (3) <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/BrownJackson" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>BrownJackson</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/CornerPost" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CornerPost</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Chevron" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Chevron</span></a></p><p>SCOTUS must like the lime light, making decision that shake democracy loving Americans.<br>Not just the immunity ruling that is no ruling but does have the desired effect: shielding <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Drumpf" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Drumpf</span></a> . But also the <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/Chevron" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Chevron</span></a> ruling, that takes out any government oversight in polluting. As does the <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/CornerPost" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CornerPost</span></a> ruling.<br>I forces me to share some rapid-fire-toots on SCOTUS. 5 in total</p><p>"Justice Jackson Warns New Ruling Could 'Devastate' Federal Regulators"<br>by Brett Wilkinson for Common Dreams</p><p><a href="https://www.commondreams.org/news/ketanji-brown-jackson-dissent" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">commondreams.org/news/ketanji-</span><span class="invisible">brown-jackson-dissent</span></a> </p><p>Quotes: <br>"The liberal justice said Congress can remedy the "profoundly destabilizing" decision by passing legislation to strengthen the federal regulatory regime."</p><p>"As the U.S. Supreme Court dealt yet another blow to the federal government's regulatory authority, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson on Monday stressed that "the ball is in Congress' court" to enact legislation to "forestall the coming chaos" wrought by the right-wing supermajority's decision."</p><p>"Monday's ruling makes it much easier to sue government agencies. As Sydney Bryant and Devon Ombres at the Center for American Progress explained, the decision "is intended to allow a swarm of legal challenges to rules that have protected the American people from bad actors and corporate malfeasance for decades."</p><p>"While numerous business advocates welcomed Monday's ruling, a broad range of consumer, labor, and other groups echoed the alarm in Jackson's dissent. "Americans expect that safeguards will protect us and our families from unsafe food, products, polluted air and water, and dangerous and unfair working conditions. This decision provides special interests, opposed to the safeguards that people rely upon, with more opportunities to challenge and seek to overturn these important protections," said Rachel Weintraub, executive director of the Coalition for Sensible Safeguards."</p><p>"Bryant and Ombres wrote that "Corner Post is not the story of David versus Goliath but rather the Trojan Horse, where moneyed interests attempt to sneak in their anti-regulation politics under the guise of altruism."</p><p>"In particular, Congress can amend §2401(a)," Jackson offered, referring to the default six-year statute of limitations, "or enact a specific review provision for APA claims, to state explicitly what any such rule must mean if it is to operate as a limitations period in this context: Regulated entities have six years from the date of the agency action to bring a lawsuit seeking to have it changed or invalidated; after that, facial challenges must end."<br>"By doing this," she added, "Congress can make clear that lawsuits bringing facial claims against agencies are not personal attack vehicles for new entities created just for that purpose."</p><p><a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/VoteBlue" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>VoteBlue</span></a> <a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/UpAndDownTheBallot" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>UpAndDownTheBallot</span></a><br><a href="https://climatejustice.social/tags/MakeDonaldDrumpfAgain" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>MakeDonaldDrumpfAgain</span></a></p>