@vonxylofon @CCC
Taking the Taliban as example is completely ridiculous, as those are a clear case of warlordism and thus should not be considered acting in due process...
It's not about non-conformism, but rather exercising self- and mutual defense and that includes refusing to normalize proven to be insecure and post-privacy bs like fingerprint-based authentification.
#WhatYouAllowIsWhatWillContinue applies with all #Enshittification and the only winning move is not to endorse, use or even respect such #SurveillanceTech.
Because it's not about the now but the fact that we allow #Cyberfacists to make politricks and laws.
Your right to be able to effectively refuse to self-incriminate may not be of concern for you or your immediate friends and family but it'll protect other peoples' lives - including outside your juristiction.
Just imagine if down the line we'll get #GAFAMs to abolish any #login but #fingerprint sensors or someones' face on their devices and then just take some underground folks in dictatorships like Russia, "P.R." China or North Korea and then tell me with a straight face that you don't believe shite like that can't and won't happen in the West because it already did happen and if you can't remember then maybe you should repeat history classes from 1930 onwards...
We as #TechLiterates have a social obligation to protect #TechIlliterates by going out of our way to push back against the dragging of the #OvertonWindow into a really nasty, Orwellian corner.
So no, if you think I am the problem then please GTFO.
