❣️a standard deviant, with gravy<p>humans are weird: a sub toot. </p><p>Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., & Brown, J. (1999). When White men can't do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 29–46. </p><p><a href="https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.13" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.13</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p>Research on "stereotype threat" suggests that the <a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/socialStigma" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>socialStigma</span></a>… can undermine the <a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/standardized" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>standardized</span></a> test performance and school outcomes of members of these groups. This research tested two assumptions about the necessary conditions for stereotype threat to impair intellectual test performance. Two experiments tested the notion with subjects for whom no stereotype of low ability exists in the domain we tested and who, in fact, were selected for high ability in that domain (math-proficient White males). In Study 1… As predicted, these stereotype-threatened White males performed worse on a difficult math test than a nonstereotype-threatened control group. Study 2 replicated this effect and further tested…</p>