Nando161<p>"It's very, very common for <a href="https://partyon.xyz/tags/people" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>people</span></a> to argue that "<a href="https://partyon.xyz/tags/sex" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>sex</span></a> is still <a href="https://partyon.xyz/tags/binary" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>binary</span></a>, outside of rare exceptions or deformities", which is usually how people justify a binary, immutable view of <a href="https://partyon.xyz/tags/biological" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>biological</span></a> sex, but its so <a href="https://partyon.xyz/tags/stupid" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>stupid</span></a> and <a href="https://partyon.xyz/tags/circular" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>circular</span></a>.<br>You can't define <a href="https://partyon.xyz/tags/intersex" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>intersex</span></a> people as "deformed" without a defined sex binary and you can't define a sex binary without excusing intersex people "<a href="https://partyon.xyz/tags/deformed" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>deformed</span></a>"."</p><p><a href="https://www.tumblr.com/nando161mando/790413546923098112" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">tumblr.com/nando161mando/79041</span><span class="invisible">3546923098112</span></a></p>