Palantir is facing renewed scrutiny over its $30M contract with ICE — but the company is doubling down on its mission.
Y Combinator founder Paul Graham criticized Palantir for building tech that powers what he called the “infrastructure of the police state.” The comments were sparked by filings revealing that ICE is working with Palantir to develop an “Immigration Lifecycle Operating System” — a tool designed to help identify deportation targets and monitor self-deportations in near real-time.
In response, Palantir’s global head of commercial, Ted Mabrey, issued a strong defense of the company’s work:
- He cited Palantir’s origins with DHS after the murder of Agent Jaime Zapata in an anti-cartel operation
- He emphasized the life-saving potential of Palantir’s software and the high stakes its engineers face
- He framed the criticism as a familiar attack on mission-driven government tech, referencing Google's Project Maven
- He reiterated the company’s values: belief in mission, resilience under scrutiny, and commitment to lawful use of technology
While Mabrey didn’t directly address Graham’s challenge to formally commit that Palantir won’t support unconstitutional practices, he noted the company has made that commitment internally and publicly “in many ways from Sunday.”
Palantir continues to recruit with a clear message — that Western democracies must not lose their technological edge and that responsible partnerships with government are essential.
What this debate highlights:
- The growing divide in tech around public sector work, especially involving surveillance and law enforcement
- The challenge of building secure tools that serve national interests while protecting civil liberties
- The reputational risks companies face when government contracts intersect with immigration and constitutional rights
At @Efani, we’re deeply aware of the tension between innovation and privacy — and this is a reminder that cybersecurity, data ethics, and constitutional accountability must evolve together.