Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Only available when logged in.
mastodon.world is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Generic Mastodon server for anyone to use.

Administered by:

Server stats:

8.2K
active users

mastodon.world: AboutStatusProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.4.5

#techdirt

1 post1 participant0 posts today
*
alecm

We’re Walling Off The Open Internet To Stop AI—And It May End Up Breaking Everything Else | Techdirt

Masnick again on top form. Also, me, previously.

Consider the broader implications: if we normalize blocking AI tools from accessing web content, where does it end? We’ve talked in the past about how many visually impaired users rely on technological tools to “read” websites for them. If we establish that all technological intermediary tools can be blocked without payment, we’re not just hurting AI companies—we’re potentially breaking accessibility tools that people depend on.

https://www.techdirt.com/2025/09/08/were-walling-off-the-open-internet-to-stop-ai-and-it-may-end-up-breaking-everything-else/

#ai#blocking#llm
alecm

Didn’t Take Long To Reveal The UK’s Online Safety Act Is Exactly The Privacy-Crushing Failure Everyone Warned About | Techdirt

Masnick on fire:

A law supposedly designed to protect children now requires victims of sexual assault to submit government IDs to access support communities. People struggling with addiction must undergo facial recognition scans to find help quitting drinking or smoking. The UK government has somehow concluded that access to basic health information and peer support networks poses such a grave threat to minors that it justifies creating a comprehensive surveillance infrastructure around it.

https://www.techdirt.com/2025/08/04/didnt-take-long-to-reveal-the-uks-online-safety-act-is-exactly-the-privacy-crushing-failure-everyone-warned-about/

Techdirt · Didn’t Take Long To Reveal The UK’s Online Safety Act Is Exactly The Privacy-Crushing Failure Everyone Warned AboutWell, well, well. The “age assurance” part of the UK’s Online Safety Act has finally gone into effect, with its age checking requirements kicking in a week and a half ago. And what do you kno…
#ageVerification#censorship#mikeMasnick
free

Copyright Absurdity: School Play Canceled Over Copyright Due To Minor Performance Changes

rss.ponder.cat/post/195225

rss.ponder.catCopyright Absurdity: School Play Canceled Over Copyright Due To Minor Performance Changes - Pondercat RSSThere’s a great deal that is absurd [https://www.techdirt.com/search/?num=20&q=copyright+absurdity&search=Search] about copyright law in America, but its most basic absurdity remains the length of time for which the copyright monopoly applies. The length of copyright protection a work gets depends on a number of factors. Was the work published before or after 1978? Was it renewed, if the former? Was it published anonymously or by a named individual? Was it work for hire? The answer to all of these impact the term length of copyright for an individual work. Keep that preamble in mind as we go through the rest of this conversation. Fanin County High School in northern Georgia had scheduled a two day, two play production of The Crucible, the famed play by Arthur Miller which tells the story of the Salem Witch Trials as an allegory for McCarthyism. The school canceled the second day’s production, however, due to what it said is a copyright issue [https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/fannin-county-school-play-canceled-over-copyright-violation-principal-says/ar-AA1F8LZ6]. > In a statement released by the high school, Principal Dr. Scott Ramsey and other school leaders said they’d “received several complaints as to an unauthorized change in the script of the play.” > > While the changes themselves were not detailed, and Channel 2 Action News has reached out for more information, school officials said the copyright violation from their license of the play made their decision for them. > > “Upon investigation, we learned that the performance did not reflect the original script. These alterations were not approved by the licensing company or administration. The performance contract for The Crucible does not allow modifications without prior written approval. Failing to follow the proper licensing approval process for additions led to a breach in our contract with the play’s publisher,” school officials said. “The infraction resulted in an automatic termination of the licensing agreement. The second performance of The Crucible could not occur because we were no longer covered by a copyright agreement.” Unfortunately some key details here are hidden behind the school’s vague statements. What were the changes? That seems important, as it would be good to know just how substantial these changes were. Who discovered the changes and raised the alarm over the licensing? Was a member of the licensor [https://www.dramatists.com/text/aboutus.asp] really in the audience during the first performance and blew the whistle? Did the school do this proactively, indicating some sort of chilling effect? While those are all valid questions, let’s really take a step back to get a sense of how absurd this is. A school made apparently some material performance changes to a play and that violated its licensing agreement such that performances would then violate the play’s copyright. A play, mind you, that was first published in 1953 and the author for which died in 2005. So, in a world where The Crucible is 72 years old, 23 years from its copyright expiration, and the creator dead for two decades… a group of high school children can’t put on the play they worked so hard to prepare for because of vague changes to the performance? In what world would we call that copyright sanity? — From Techdirt [https://www.techdirt.com] via this RSS feed [https://www.techdirt.com/feed/]
#techdirt
TrendingLive feeds
About