mastodon.world is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Generic Mastodon server for anyone to use.

Server stats:

12K
active users

#gemini

153 posts93 participants0 posts today

Tuesday April 1st, 2025

Today the #Moon 🌘 continues in earthy, sense-oriented #Taurus ♉,

then enters mental #Gemini. ♊

The #TaurusMoon awakens:

✨ gratitude 🙏🏽
✨ the ability to receive 💐
✨ a focus on the senses 🎶

that helps you process the bigger picture. 🌠

Once the Moon enters Gemini, ♊

it's time to put your feelings into words! 📝

Details in this video youtu.be/ucffmiiFhNI

youtu.be- YouTubeEnjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

I feel like there is no worse LLM than
Google's #Gemini.

"Are all probability measures positive measure?" -> Yes!
"Are all positive measures signed measures?" -> Yes!
"Are all probability measures signed measures?" -> NO!!

#teletext celebrates 45 years in the Netherlands (and elsewhere).

#gopher and #gemini fans etc. rejoice 👾 and unite.

Need to seek out one of these days if there is a text-first #mastodon client (only display images on demand, not by default). Would probably make the flow much more dense, less noisy.

nos.nl/artikel/2561892-informa

nos.nl'Informatief en zonder poppenkast': Teletekst bestaat 45 jaarOok na 45 jaar wordt NOS Teletekst nog volop gebruikt. Fans waarderen vooral de korte, bondige berichten "zonder nutteloze poppenkast".

Wow, mighty impressed by Google Gemini 2.5 pro. With help of ChatGPT o1 I had created python code to solve Sudokus and to Generate Sudokus. For the UI I wanted to try out Gemini.

So I wrote a single prompt, more a spec, of the UI features I wanted.

And the AI delivered a perfectly working, beautiful UI, even with some features I hadn't specified so clearly.

Here's the prompt:
You are an expert python developer.

Below you find python code that can solve and generate sudoku puzzles.

Please write python code for a tk user interface that allows users to solve sudoku puzzles generated by this code. The UI shall have these features

* button to generate a new puzzle, with a difficulty between 1 and 10. Based on the difficulty, use generate_random_start_board, followed by generate_sudoku(startboard, difficulty).
* see the sudoku in standard sudoku layout with clearly separated 3x3 spaces. Use large cells. A cell holds up to 9 very small numbers of what the user thinks are possible numbers, and one large number with the value for the cell the user chose.
* possibility to click into a cell which marks the cell as active
* a toggle (you decide which kind) that decides what happens if the user types a number. If the toggle is "domain" (please find a better word) then you add/remove one of the small numbers. If the toggle is "value" (please find a better word), then you enter the actual value of the cell.
* a button to check whether the solution is still valid, with appropriate means of showing this to the user.
* a restart button
* a "new puzzle" button

And here's two screenshots. Isn't this mindblowing?

#sudoku#gemini#llm

Gemini 2.5 Pro еще ближе к человеку, но реально рассуждать умеют только модели OpenAI

25 марта вышла новая модель Gemini 2.5 Pro от Google. Много уже было про нее сказано, но я стараюсь не обращать внимания на волны хайпа вокруг новинок, ориентируясь на свои доверенные источники. Одним из них является любительский бенчмарк SimpleBench , который тестирует здравый смысл в реальной жизни. Он интересен тем, что в нем самый обычный человек набирает 83.7%, а рекорд для LLM еще недавно был лишь 46.4%.

habr.com/ru/articles/896306/

#Gemini #o1 #reasoning #claude #deepseek #google #25 #pro #искусственный_интеллект #нейросети

ХабрGemini 2.5 Pro еще ближе к человеку, но реально рассуждать умеют только модели OpenAIМоя первая статья на Хабре, хочу поделиться своими находками и мыслями. На этой неделе вышла новая модель Gemini 2.5 Pro от Google. Много уже было про нее сказано, но я стараюсь не обращать внимания...

People have low expectations for AI. I asked ChatGPT (paid account, not the free stuff) what would make ChatGPT better. I think the answer is a lot higher quality than what people keep saying one should expect. This is what I got:

--- My Prompt:
With DeepSeek, there are things it is very good at, but it fails quickly and rather spectacularly. Your models tend to break down as well, but somewhere there must be a model that will be able to stay on topic, even when the topic changes, so that conversations move around like human conversations move around subject-to-subject. What would take ChatGPT over the top?

--- ChatGPT reply:
Here’s what it’ll take to get closer to that human-like conversation flow:

  1. Long-Term Memory That Actually Works. Most models either have no memory or they remember only in a clunky, artificial way.

A better memory system would not just recall facts, but contextual relevance—like “we talked about LLM efficiency two days ago and you hate cheerleader language.”

It has to be smart recall, not just data storage.

  1. Thread Awareness
    Imagine a model that can say: “You mentioned DeepSeek earlier. Should I compare it again now that we’ve brought up open-source tools?”
    That requires models to track not just words, but conversational branches—like a tree, not a straight line.

  2. Graceful Fallbacks
    When a model doesn’t know, it should gracefully pivot, not hallucinate or go off-topic. This kind of conversational “stability” is rare and subtle.

Most models that fail “spectacularly,” as you said, are trying to bluff through complexity instead of narrowing scope or clarifying.

  1. Hybrid Contextual ReasoningThe future model needs to reason across subjects rather than switching on and off.

If we're talking about language models, and you shift to science fiction, it should be able to bring up Asimov or neural networks in storytelling—bridging topics, not just hopping between them.

Right now, most models either:

Stay sharp but shallow (good at Q&A, bad at memory), or

Drift into friendly nonsense (chatty, but brittle)

The sweet spot will be a system that grows with you across time and topics—and doesn’t forget what you value in a conversation.

....

When you see stuff posted online meant to minimize the quality of output possible, This was a single question with no leader. I think this is the kind of answer we want from our AI devices.

Thoughts? Feel free to tear this response apart. It needs that kind of human analysis.

#ai#openai#deepseek